| AML |
The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) fines BitPay for apparent violations of multiple sanctions programs related to digital currency transactions (18.02.2021). Bit Pay, a U.S. based company that offers a payment processing solution for merchants to accept digital currency as payment for goods and services, has agreed to remit $507,375 to settle its potential civil liability for 2,102 apparent violations of multiple sanctions programs. BitPay allowed persons who appear to have been located in the Crimea region of Ukraine, Cuba, North Korea, Iran, Sudan, and Syria to transact with merchants in the United States and elsewhere using digital currency on BitPay’s platform even though BitPay had location information, including Internet Protocol (IP) addresses and other location data, about those persons prior to effecting the transactions.
The action emphasizes that OFAC obligations apply to all U.S. persons, including those involved in providing digital currency services. As part of a risk-based approach, OFAC encourages companies that provide digital currency services to implement sanctions compliance controls commensurate with their risk profile. |
| Stablecoins |
Tether, Bitfinex and iFinex (The Companies) settle with New York Attorney General (NYAG) over allegations regarding hiding of losses, and misrepresentation about the fiat reserves that backed Tether’s “USDT” tokens. (17.02.2021). As part of the settlement, it was agreed, inter alia, on the following:
- A prohibition on trading activity (including Over-the-Counter activity) with any New York persons and entities (including any New York entity that holds BitLicense or Trust Account from the NY Department of Financial Services).
- Monetary relief – the Companies will pay $18.5 million, admitting no wrongdoing.
- Mandatory reporting to the NYAG, inter alia, on Tether’s reserves; transfers of funds between Tether and Bitfinex; client, reserve and operational account segregation.
- Tether will be required to publish the categories of assets backing tether tokens (“e.g., cash, loans, securities, etc.”, as stated in the settlement agreement), specifying the percentage of each such category, and specifying whether any such category constituting a loan or receivable or similar is to an affiliated entity.
|
| Securities
|
Investors’ class action lawsuit against a BNT token issuer, an on-chain liquidity provider Bancor, was dismissed by a New York court (22.02.2021). The plaintiff alleged that BNT token was a security and that as a result of its issuance, promotion, and sale by, or on behalf of, Bancor, he had suffered damages and sought rescission of his purchase. The court ruled that the plaintiff lacked personal jurisdiction, had failed to demonstrate injury-in-fact, and that New York is not a reasonable and convenient place to conduct this litigation. The court mentioned that promotional materials which included repeated solicitation of BNT sales at conferences across the US, and communication through social media referring to US support by Bancor’s service provider, “are insufficient to support personal jurisdiction over citizens of another country”. The court has also added that “the federal securities laws do not reach a purchase and sale outside the United States”. |
| SEC Division of Examination outlines focus on digital assets (26.02.2021). The Division of examination has issued a risk alert which provide observations made by Division staff during the examination of investment advisers, broker-dealers, and transfer agents regarding Digital Asset Securities.
The Division is of the opinion that this risk alert may assist firms in developing and enhancing their compliance practices. In addition, it provides transparency about areas of focus for the Division’s future examinations. |
Developments in the SEC v. Ripple Labs, Inc. et al. case.
- On 15 February 2021, Ripple Labs, Inc.; Brad Garlinghouse, CEO; Christian Larsen, board chairman; and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filed a joint letter with Judge Analisa Torres in the Southern District of New York. The key takeaway from this letter is that, contrary to early expectations, the parties “do not believe there is a prospect for settlement at this time.”
- On 18 February 2021, the SEC filed an amended complaint, including several new details and allegations. For instance, as a response to Ripple’s attorney Jeremy Hogan argument that the SEC needs to prove not just that XRP is a security, but also that XRP executives knew that it was wrong to sell the asset and went forth with the sales regardless, the SEC added a paragraph noting that “both played significant roles in negotiating and approving institutional sales, and other offers and sales of XRP to institutional investors.” Hogan posted a video summarizing some of those changes.
- On 3 March 2021, Ripple’s Chris Larsen filed motion to dismiss SEC case over XRP sales. Larsen’s lawyers contend the SEC failed to show that Larsen knew at the time XRP units were securities and Ripple’s activities were inappropriate. To back this up, they refer, among other things, to the fact that the Justice Department and FinCEN considered and regulated XRP as a “virtual currency”; a fact inconsistent with it being a security.
|